 |
| Volunteer
activities such as this Compton Creek cleanup
can continue without peril thanks to CA
bill AB2690. Photo: Bill Groak/Pacific
Communications Group |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Governor
signs bill correcting code that required
payment for volunteers
Great
news! California Assemblyperson Loni Hancock's
bill, AB 2690, unanimously passed in the Assembly
and the Senate and was signed into law by Governor
Schwarzenegger.
The
bill corrected the section of the California
Labor Code that
was misinterpreted to require volunteers be
paid for restoration, construction
and clean up efforts. The closing language
in the
new law embodies the importance of the action: "In
order to encourage citizen initiative and
volunteer action in state service and to
eliminate all
legal disincentives and impediments to volunteering
on public works projects, it is necessary
that this bill take place immediately."
Now
that the Governor has signed the bill in to
law,
environmental agencies such as the California
Coastal Conservancy and the State Water
Resources Control Board, can go back to awarding
grants to cost-effective, volunteer driven,
clean-up
and restoration efforts. Also, non-profit
environmental groups such as Heal the Bay can
now continue with volunteer programs without
the fear of losing grant funding due to "unacceptable"
use of volunteers (see Background below).
Heal
the Bay thanks Assemblyperson Hancock, Governor
Schwarzenegger, and all the legislators, volunteer
groups and common-sense union leaders for eliminating "paid
volunteers" from the state's vocabulary. Also,
a special thanks to the over 1000 Heal the
Bay volunteers and members that sent letters
to the Governor urging him to eliminate California's
anti-volunteer policies.
Background
Late in 2003, the Department
of Industrial Relations ruled that volunteer
labor in most cases can't be used in projects
that use public funds. In fact, the department
fined a Sacramento-area nonprofit environmental
group $33,000 in part because the organization
used student volunteers to help restore a stream
bed.
The decision was based on
the prevailing wage law, passed in 1989. The
law was developed to keep non-union contractors
from underbidding union groups for public works
projects. According to the law, volunteer work
can only be used when a public works project:
is entirely directed and completed by unpaid
people; will be used primarily by community-based
organizations; won't have an "adverse impact" on
employment; and has been reviewed and approved
by the director of Industrial Relations for compliance
with all of these regulations.
In 1999, the precedent for
the 2003 decision was set in a case involving
the Lewis Center for Earth Sciences, run by the
Partnership for Academic Excellence in Apple
Valley. The City of Apple Valley received $2
million from the state, and partnered with the
Partnership for Academic Excellence to build
the Lewis Center for Earth Sciences. The decision
in this case stated that even though the nonprofit
Partnership for Academic Excellence foundation
was in charge of the project and the hiring of
all contractors, because it was using state funds,
the project counted as a "public works project" and
the center had to pay prevailing wages.
The real turning point for
the issue came in 2003, when the Sacramento Watersheds
Action Group put together a project to restore
Sulphur Creek, in Redding, using state grant
money. The organization partnered with nearby
Shasta College to have students earn class credit
in watershed restoration for removing vegetation
and repairing weakened and eroded creek banks.
A local labor group complained, and the state
investigated. The state determined that 60 workers
- some paid and some volunteers - all should
have been paid between $12 and $50 per hour.
The Sacramento Watersheds Action Group had to
pay fines and back wages.
While this case was different
from what organizations like Heal the Bay do
- in that students were required to participate
in the project for class credit, and operated
heavy machinery such as backhoes - it did set
a precedent that could have devastated groups
like Heal the Bay.
For example, based on the
DIR's decision, the State Water Resources Control
board put together a series of guidelines that
regulate how environmental organizations that
use grant funds from the state can use volunteer
labor. The most damaging of those guidelines
was that the environmental groups must send each
grant application through the Director of the
DIR to ensure compliance with existing labor
laws as interpreted in these recent cases.
For Heal the Bay, this meant
that, just like the Sacramento Watersheds
Action Group, in most cases our use of volunteers
could be ruled unacceptable and we could lose
all grant funding. Fortunately, bill
AB 2690 will prevent this from happenning.
|