Beach Report Card section (new window) Heal the Bay's 15th Annual Beach Report Card for 2004-2005
May 25, 2005
Table of Contents
Cover Page
Executive Summary
Introduction
About the Beach
Report Card
2004-2005 Analyses
Beach Pollution
Patterns
Del Norte
Humboldt
Mendocino
Sonoma
Marin
San Francisco
San Mateo
Santa Cruz
Monterey
San Luis Obispo
Santa Barbara
Ventura
Los Angeles
Orange
San Diego
State Legislation
Accomplishments &
Recommendations
Appendix A:
Thresholds-Grading
Appendix B:
PDF Files
Appendix C:
Acknowledgements
Appendix A: Thresholds & Grading

Each threshold is based on the prescribed standards set in the California Department of Health Service's Beach Bathing Water Standards. The magnitude of the water quality threshold exceedance and laboratory variability was addressed by the inclusion of standard deviations in setting the thresholds. The standard deviations used were developed during the 1998 laboratory intercalibration study led by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project and the Orange County Sanitation Districts that involved over 20 shoreline water quality monitoring agencies in Southern California.

The number of points subtracted from 100 for total coliform, fecal coliform, and enterococcus are: 6 points for bacterial densities falling in group one (threshold minus one standard deviation or T - 1 s.d.), 18 points for group two (T + 1 s.d.), and 24 points for group three (indicator densities > T + 1 s.d.). The point system for total to fecal ratio is: 7 points for group one, 21 points for group two, 35 points for group three, and 42 points for group four (very high health risk). Exceedance of the total to fecal ratio threshold leads to lower grades because exposure to water with low ratios causes an even higher incidence of a variety of adverse health effects relative to the health risk associated with the other bacterial indicators.

These points are added to obtain a subtotal for that week. The point subtotal for the most current week's worth of data is multiplied by 1.5 in order to give it more weight. Then the points from the previous three weeks are added in for an overall point total. The total number of points for the 28-day period is divided by the average number of samples collected in a week. This number is then subtracted from the original 100 points to obtain a grand total from which a letter grade is derived.

Go to the top of this page  This page :: Top
Go to the previous section  Previous section :: Accomplishments & Recommendations
Go to the next section  Next section :: Appendix B: PDF Files
Table A-1. Bacterial Indicator Exceedence Thresholds in cfu/ml.
Group 1
T - 1 s.d.(1)
2
T + 1 s.d.
3
>T + 1 s.d.
4
Very High Risk
Total Coliform 6,711-9,999 10,000(2)-
14,900
>14,900 na
Fecal Coliform 268-399 400-596 >596 na
Enterococcus 70-103 104-155 >155 na
Total to Fecal Ratio
(if: Total > 1,000)
10.1-13 7.1-10 2.1-7 <2.1
(1) s.d. - standard deviation
(2) Red numbers are the CA State Health Dept. standards for a single sample.
Table A-2. Threshold Points
Group 1
T - 1 s.d.(1)
2
T + 1 s.d.
3
>T + 1 s.d.
4
Very High Risk
Total Coliform
Fecal Coliform
Enterococcus
6 18 24  
Total to Fecal Ratio
(if: Total > 1,000)
7 21 35 42
(1) s.d. - standard deviation
Table A-3. Grading System
Points Letter Grade
100 A+
90-99 A
80-89 B
70-79 C
60-69 D
0-59 F
Appendix A: Thresholds & Grading
2004-2005 Annual Beach Report Card


Copyright © 2005 Heal the Bay. All rights reserved.
The fishbones logo is a trademark of Heal the Bay.
The Beach Report CardSM is a registered servicemark of Heal the Bay.